Wiser Usability: An Age of Experience

Guidelines for designing “senior-friendly” websites have been published by AARP, the National Institute on Aging, the World Wide Web Consortium, among others. However, very few web developers follow such guidelines, even when older adults are their intended audience. As we age, we are likely to experience:

• lower contrast sensitivity and color perception, making links harder to identify.
• reduced dexterity and fine motor control, making small targets such as buttons and links harder to select.
• increased tendency to be visually distracted, making navigation more difficult.
• greater difficulty concentrating, making navigation and learning more difficult.

In the future, even non-governmental institutions will need to comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act: websites must be accessible to users with certain limitations, including those associated with aging.

To make sure that you’re optimizing the web experience for your audience, let Wiser Usability evaluate your website.

Is it easily usable by anyone over, say, 40?

Common age-related changes affect our vision, hearing, fine motor control, and cognition.  Visual changes, for example, start at about age 40;  by age 50, most of us experience them.

Does the design of your website take this into account?  With the shifting age demographic and the massive increase in the number of internet users over 40, you don’t want to ignore this audience.

Formal guidelines for website accessibility exist, but in practice, few website designers use them.

Make sure you’re giving your intended audience the best user experience possible.  Let Wiser Usability show you how.

What our clients say about Wiser Usability

“I am more than satisfied with the way our whole website now looks cleaner and more consistent — advantages that came along with the work you did to upgrade accessibility for those who visit our site. … Thanks to Wiser Usability, not only is our website more accessible, but you have presented options to us for further improvements.” — Tom Rickert, Executive Director, Access Exchange International

Continue reading

“Wiser Usability reviewed our website, pointing out simple improvements that make the site more accessible and usable for seniors and people with disabilities. Their suggestions made sense to us and can be implemented in stages, making it easy to better serve an important part of our customer base.” — Eric Whittington, Bird and Beckett Books and Records

Continue reading

Usability vs. Accessibility vs. Design

Even among User Interface wonks, there’s not exactly universal agreement on the meaning of these terms. For the purpose of creating a common understanding, let’s define them as:

• Usability: How easy it is for the intended users to successfully use a website or application for its intended purpose.  Usability is often measured in terms of task completion time, success rate, need for help, or users’ satisfaction or frustration. Usability depends on design and accessibility: highly usable products and services are those that are well designed and accessible to a wide audience.
• Accessibility: How easy it is for everyone — even people with perceptual and physical disabilities — to access and experience the content of a website or application. Making websites and software applications accessible requires providing text alternatives for pictures, captions for audio content, navigation aids, and larger “target” areas for those with impaired motor control, among other things.
• Design: People often use this term to refer only to visual aesthetic appeal, but in fact “design” covers many different aspects of a website or software product besides visual appeal, including how well it fits the tasks and goals of the intended users, and its complexity or simplicity (as measured in how much users must remember to use it effectively).

You can design a website that’s visually stunning but that doesn’t fit users’ tasks well or that people can’t access or use effectively or efficiently. Or you can design a site that’s very functional, usable, and accessible, but ugly to look at.

However, the ideal website is highly usable, universally accessible, and designed for efficient use and aesthetic appeal.

By the Numbers

Who is most affected by unusable, inaccessible, or poorly-designed websites?

Anyone with impaired vision, hearing, speech, motor control, or cognitive processing.

Changes in vision, hearing, motor control, and cognition are highly correlated with aging, and a large percentage of older adults are affected in one or more of these dimensions.

Who is considered “older”?

How many older people are we talking about? (U.S. only)

How many people of any age can be considered impaired? (U.S. only)

Who goes online?